Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
future_fabulators:new_approaches_and_needs_in_foresight [2014-11-29 13:41] – created nikfuture_fabulators:new_approaches_and_needs_in_foresight [2014-12-10 17:54] nik
Line 3: Line 3:
 (workshop at FTA 2014 - 27 NOV 2014) (workshop at FTA 2014 - 27 NOV 2014)
  
-{{>https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15902727641/}} \\ 
  
 +short summary workshop "New approaches in FTA / foresight" at the EU FTA conference, November 2014
  
-{{>https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15904696785/}} \\+New Approaches
  
 +4 major clusters: 
 +  + IT-based / "automated” foresight (in early stages, to be used with a "disclaimer” because of the current hype, experiences still have to be evaluated and sense-making still not generated;) Relies strongly on having had a precise "question" / task before starting
 +  + Integrated qualitative-quantitative approaches. Few examples, debated how far foresight should go - should never succumb to the traditional numbers dominance
 +  + Open and Crowdsourced 
 +    - Lots of potential also in terms of who funds foresight and how - crowdfunding possibilities e.g. for regional / community foresight  
 +    - Quite widespread in terms of open approaches
 +  + New forms of communication: Storytelling / Visualization / Gaming:
 +    - Here, we had the most real "new" examples, e.g. from overlaps / working with Design Fiction, Experiential Foresight (Roleplaying), "Tangible Foresight" ("Exhibitions" / Futures Windows; Objects from the future, ...)
 +    - Major potential for improving the impact / establishing new routes to engagement
 +  - Further Trends / Tendencies: Impacts Assessment; Focus on Pre-Foresight-Phase (Conceptualization); Tailor-Made Foresight / Test-driving and then adapting approaches / Stochastic tinkering for finding best approach; Cluster / cross-sectoral foresight; Open Innovation Foresight ; Meta-Trend = towards hybrid / combined approaches
 +  - new application fields also emerging, e.g. society-wide foresight, e.g. with kids; or foresight for therapy, …
  
-{{>https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15717210038/}} \\+New or Unmet Needs in Foresight 
 + 
 +Where are new needs? 
 +  - Needs in Innovation Field are expanding 
 +  - Also in corporate foresight 
 +  - Health / social systems 
 +  - “Political” Foresight 
 + 
 +Need for Shared Theoretical Background / Futures Literacy / practical principles 
 +  - Shared language / vocabulary 
 +  - Prove / exemplify impacts 
 +  - Practitioners being clear about values 
 +  - Need for more value-based approaches 
 + 
 +Tools and Skills Needs 
 +  - Open Toolkits / Prototypes 
 +  - Take into account emotions and experience 
 +  - Use of narratives / storytelling; stimulating the imagination 
 +  - Integrate diversity of input (“overflow” effect) 
 +  - Selling power needed 
 +  - Bridge need for reflecting complexity and smart / emotional communication means 
 +  - Speed - can we provide instant gratification in foresight?  
 +  - Need for skills in change management / changing of cultures (in organizations) 
 + 
 +Lots of room for improvement in realm of implementing results / link to decision-making 
 +  - Improve impacts by analysing power / timing issues (right person / right time) 
 +  - Clarify objectives; Increase acceptance of outputs; give meaning to results 
 +  - Create link to implementation / strategy (top-down or bottom-up?); internalization needed 
 +  - Create demand for citizens  
 + 
 + 
 +Foresight 2030  
 +  - Many alternative scenarios possible 
 +  - Threat of "automation" / takeover from other disciplines / actors 
 +  - Opportunity for larger-scale roll-out if being clear on what it can and can't do, relies on clearly demonstrated benefits 
 +  - Foresight as an everyday tool: low cost and easily accessible tools for the everyday user - personal fore-sighting 
 +  - Professional foresight becomes more about framing, sense making and narrative - as scanning becomes more automated 
 + 
 +Who pays for foresight in 2030? Alongside a traditional commissioning model by corporations and governments, crowd funded foresight occurs when groups of individuals involved in communities/advocacy come together to co-fund the foresight projects they really want to see 
 +  - Foresight becomes part of developing resilience, adapting to change and facilitating behavioral shifts and changing culture 
 + 
 +Overall insight, across all 3 groups / topics: New approaches are developing rapidly, especially from working with / overlaps with approaches from other disciplines. The (partly normative) discussion in the community is still missing on which new approaches to push where and for what specific purpose, or where / how to also "counteract" trends and safeguard foresight depth and quality levels.  
 + 
 +  
 + 
 + 
 +{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15902727641/}} \\ 
 + 
 + 
 +{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15904696785/}} \\ 
 + 
 + 
 +{{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15717210038/}} \\
  • future_fabulators/new_approaches_and_needs_in_foresight.txt
  • Last modified: 2014-12-10 18:57
  • by nik