Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
future_fabulators:new_approaches_and_needs_in_foresight [2014-11-29 13:41] – created nik | future_fabulators:new_approaches_and_needs_in_foresight [2014-12-10 17:54] – nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
(workshop at FTA 2014 - 27 NOV 2014) | (workshop at FTA 2014 - 27 NOV 2014) | ||
- | {{> | ||
+ | short summary workshop "New approaches in FTA / foresight" | ||
- | {{> | + | New Approaches |
+ | 4 major clusters: | ||
+ | + IT-based / " | ||
+ | + Integrated qualitative-quantitative approaches. Few examples, debated how far foresight should go - should never succumb to the traditional numbers dominance | ||
+ | + Open and Crowdsourced | ||
+ | - Lots of potential also in terms of who funds foresight and how - crowdfunding possibilities e.g. for regional / community foresight | ||
+ | - Quite widespread in terms of open approaches | ||
+ | + New forms of communication: | ||
+ | - Here, we had the most real " | ||
+ | - Major potential for improving the impact / establishing new routes to engagement | ||
+ | - Further Trends / Tendencies: Impacts Assessment; Focus on Pre-Foresight-Phase (Conceptualization); | ||
+ | - new application fields also emerging, e.g. society-wide foresight, e.g. with kids; or foresight for therapy, … | ||
- | {{>https:// | + | New or Unmet Needs in Foresight |
+ | |||
+ | Where are new needs? | ||
+ | - Needs in Innovation Field are expanding | ||
+ | - Also in corporate foresight | ||
+ | - Health / social systems | ||
+ | - “Political” Foresight | ||
+ | |||
+ | Need for Shared Theoretical Background / Futures Literacy / practical principles | ||
+ | - Shared language / vocabulary | ||
+ | - Prove / exemplify impacts | ||
+ | - Practitioners being clear about values | ||
+ | - Need for more value-based approaches | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tools and Skills Needs | ||
+ | - Open Toolkits / Prototypes | ||
+ | - Take into account emotions and experience | ||
+ | - Use of narratives / storytelling; | ||
+ | - Integrate diversity of input (“overflow” effect) | ||
+ | - Selling power needed | ||
+ | - Bridge need for reflecting complexity and smart / emotional communication means | ||
+ | - Speed - can we provide instant gratification in foresight? | ||
+ | - Need for skills in change management / changing of cultures (in organizations) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lots of room for improvement in realm of implementing results / link to decision-making | ||
+ | - Improve impacts by analysing power / timing issues (right person / right time) | ||
+ | - Clarify objectives; Increase acceptance of outputs; give meaning to results | ||
+ | - Create link to implementation / strategy (top-down or bottom-up? | ||
+ | - Create demand for citizens | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Foresight 2030 | ||
+ | - Many alternative scenarios possible | ||
+ | - Threat of " | ||
+ | - Opportunity for larger-scale roll-out if being clear on what it can and can't do, relies on clearly demonstrated benefits | ||
+ | - Foresight as an everyday tool: low cost and easily accessible tools for the everyday user - personal fore-sighting | ||
+ | - Professional foresight becomes more about framing, sense making and narrative - as scanning becomes more automated | ||
+ | |||
+ | Who pays for foresight in 2030? Alongside a traditional commissioning model by corporations and governments, | ||
+ | - Foresight becomes part of developing resilience, adapting to change and facilitating behavioral shifts and changing culture | ||
+ | |||
+ | Overall insight, across all 3 groups / topics: New approaches are developing rapidly, especially from working with / overlaps with approaches from other disciplines. The (partly normative) discussion in the community is still missing on which new approaches to push where and for what specific purpose, or where / how to also " | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{>http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{>http:// |