Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
future_fabulators:scenario_design_debrief_20131013 [2013-10-14 17:27] – 141.138.51.151future_fabulators:scenario_design_debrief_20131013 [2013-10-16 09:24] – maja
Line 26: Line 26:
   * The process shouldn't be derailed while it is unfolding, for the sake of group dynamics, timing and concentration. Divert the process suggestions until the debrief (which should be seen as an essential part of the process)   * The process shouldn't be derailed while it is unfolding, for the sake of group dynamics, timing and concentration. Divert the process suggestions until the debrief (which should be seen as an essential part of the process)
   * The issue of divided attention and unrelated communication due to internet use remains problematic - it continues to result in off-topic remarks and conversations breakers, which in an intense meeting disrupts conversations and flow. Perhaps clearer instructions about time and place for external communication and unrelated work would help (before 10h and after 17h wasn't enough).   * The issue of divided attention and unrelated communication due to internet use remains problematic - it continues to result in off-topic remarks and conversations breakers, which in an intense meeting disrupts conversations and flow. Perhaps clearer instructions about time and place for external communication and unrelated work would help (before 10h and after 17h wasn't enough).
-  * Computer is useful for note taking and on-topic browsing, but it's difficult for the facilitator and participants to know what is going on. Using tablets rather than laptops might be visually less disruptive and the content could be more easily shared. Tangible and heads-up interfaces or a large shared desktop could be interesting to explore. +  * Computer is useful for note taking and on-topic browsing, but it's difficult for the facilitator and participants to know what is going on. Using tablets rather than laptops might be visually less disruptive and the content could be more easily shared. Tangible and heads-up interfaces or a large shared desktop (like Reactable for example http://www.reactable.com/) could be interesting to explore. 
  • future_fabulators/scenario_design_debrief_20131013.txt
  • Last modified: 2014-02-06 07:55
  • by maja