Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
hosting_craft [2013-12-19 16:09] – [Session 4: The conversations] maja | hosting_craft [2015-01-08 17:44] – [Session 7: Flow] maja | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==== Hosting craft ==== | ==== Hosting craft ==== | ||
- | This page is an overview of facilitation and hosting techniques practiced at FoAM for over a decade. | + | This page has an overview of facilitation and hosting techniques practiced at FoAM for over a decade. The page is structured based on the course notes for the participatory Hosting Craft training sessions designed by Maja Kuzmanovic in 2013-2014. As such the page is still in progress... |
//With thanks to Maggie Buxton, Simone Poutnik, Hendrik Tiessinga (and others from The Art of Hosting community), Nick Payne, Ineke Van Mulders, Edel Maex, Christina Stadlbauer, Helga Hartl and many others who have facilitated workshops, held trainings and retreats through which we experienced the practice and the craft of hosting and facilitation.// | //With thanks to Maggie Buxton, Simone Poutnik, Hendrik Tiessinga (and others from The Art of Hosting community), Nick Payne, Ineke Van Mulders, Edel Maex, Christina Stadlbauer, Helga Hartl and many others who have facilitated workshops, held trainings and retreats through which we experienced the practice and the craft of hosting and facilitation.// | ||
Line 341: | Line 341: | ||
- | Next time (January | + | Next time (April 2014): ' |
+ | ==== Session 5: Listening and summarising ==== | ||
+ | While the participants are ' | ||
+ | === Listening === | ||
+ | A few notes on [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Comprehension == | ||
+ | * understanding what the other person is saying. | ||
+ | * shared meaning, language, jargon issues | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Retaining == | ||
+ | * memory: related to making meaning (memory fills in the blanks - ' | ||
+ | * different memories, different meanings attached to the same statement | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can’t retain everything we hear, several reasons: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * cramming: a lot of info at the same time stored in short term memory, then purged | ||
+ | * not paying attention to what is being said | ||
+ | * not finding something important - looses meaning | ||
+ | * lack motivation to better remember what is being said: using info immediately after it was received increases our ability to retain information | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Responding == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * if in an interaction (conversation rather than lecture), you’re required to respond, it makes your listening more active | ||
+ | * mindless listening <-> mindful (active) listening | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Active listening == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * both words and non-verbal signals (body language) | ||
+ | * hearing, then restating/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Barriers: | ||
+ | * distractions (physical - sounds, visual…) | ||
+ | * trigger words | ||
+ | * vocabulary | ||
+ | * limited attention span | ||
+ | * making assumptions based on our own experience, rather than really listening | ||
+ | * conversational narcissism, shift response - listen to what someone says, then turning the conversation to you without showing interest whether the others are listening, or whether what you’re saying is continuing/ | ||
+ | * support response - opposite of shift response: focus conversational attention to the other person, encourages cooperation (remember compass) - not me-oriented but we-oriented | ||
+ | |||
+ | What to do: | ||
+ | * put personal emotions aside | ||
+ | * ask clarifying questions | ||
+ | * paraphrase and repeat to make sure you understand | ||
+ | * try to overcome all environmental distractions | ||
+ | * not judging or arguing prematurely (holding onto a personal opinion) | ||
+ | * eye contact (in most EU cultures) and appropriate body language (mirroring, or middle position) | ||
+ | * empathise, try to listen from within the others’ shoes | ||
+ | * intonation and stressing particular words can keep listeners from being distracted | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Summarising === | ||
+ | |||
+ | i.e. Restating main ideas of a conversation in as few words as possible. Summary is like a quilt that pulls together very different pieces of fabric | ||
+ | |||
+ | In a summary the host takes what everyone has said into account, distills essential points in a concise and clear language. It's important to pay attention to what kind of information you’re summarising (is it describing the context, is it a call for action, opinions, answers to questions), especially if there are 'next steps' to be done. Always end by asking if people agree with your summary, if they have something to add, if something is unclear or if you misunderstood something - "did I get it right, did i get it all?" By the end of the summary, people should have a sense of closure, that the discussion is rounded up and there isn’t more to be said. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A good summary: | ||
+ | * uses the words of the speaker so they maintain ownership of what is said | ||
+ | * enables an overview of the discussion/ | ||
+ | * finds the essence in the jungle of words and opinions | ||
+ | * no advice, opinion or re-interpretation | ||
+ | * it doesn’t have to be perfect - it allows the group to reflect on whether you understood correctly - and if not, maybe others didn’t either… | ||
+ | * it gives the speakers a chance to 'hear themselves' | ||
+ | * sees things as a whole, when all the details, distractions, | ||
+ | * ensures clear communication | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == How to structure summaries == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Be short and to the point, keep in mind what the topic or the question of the conversation is and find a words to pull together possible answers/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Begin with a statement that shows that you’re summarising: | ||
+ | * let me see if i understand so far… | ||
+ | * here’s what i’ve heard, let me know if i’m missing something | ||
+ | * let me see if i have all of this… | ||
+ | * we’re coming to a close and i’d like to try to pull together what we said, to see where we are and where we’re going… | ||
+ | |||
+ | If there are different opinions or options, make sure to include them all | ||
+ | * on the one hand… while on the other… | ||
+ | * at the same time… | ||
+ | * and… | ||
+ | |||
+ | End with an open question: | ||
+ | * what else? | ||
+ | * what other points are there to consider? | ||
+ | |||
+ | When to summarise? | ||
+ | * at transition points | ||
+ | * in between sessions | ||
+ | * when changing topics | ||
+ | * to wrap up a session | ||
+ | * in the beginning and/or end of the day | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Impromptu public speaking === | ||
+ | |||
+ | When summarising, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | A speech has 3 elements, and so does a summary: | ||
+ | * logos (content and structure) | ||
+ | * pathos (emotional impact) | ||
+ | * ethos (personal credibility and likeability) | ||
+ | (all three depend on the audience’s sensitivity) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Logos: | ||
+ | * keep it simple and easy to remember | ||
+ | * establish common ground | ||
+ | * think about what might be objections and counter arguments | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pathos: | ||
+ | * acknowledge your audience’s values and feelings | ||
+ | * share your own feelings and reactions | ||
+ | * use striking facts and contrasts | ||
+ | * be personal and visual | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ethos: | ||
+ | * show that you care | ||
+ | * acknowledge the colour of your lens | ||
+ | * use examples | ||
+ | * refer to people | ||
+ | * be real and interactive | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * how does your life change with your children on school holidays | ||
+ | * what does climate chaos and unpredictable weather conditions impact your life? | ||
+ | * how do you deal with exhaustion? | ||
+ | * what could we work on together? | ||
+ | * etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each host-in-training should have a chance to listen and summarise, so you should have as many rounds as hosts. Make the conversations 5-10 minutes long, then have the host summarise. Discuss the delivery and content of the summary together (did the host capture the gist of the conversation? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Next session (20140612 at 2PM): Graphic Harvesting/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Session 6: Graphic harvesting ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Many thanks to Nik Payne for much of the information in this session comes from him... | ||
+ | |||
+ | === What is graphic harvesting/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Not just about pretty pictures! It is much more about listening, digesting, synthesizing, | ||
+ | |||
+ | * When the budget is tight, the facilitator can be the graphic harvester as well, but if possible it’s better to have a facilitator focusing on hosting and the recorder on harvesting. The relationship between the host and the recorder is a very important one to cultivate - you’re there to support each other… | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Why do it? == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * It helps to keep your and other participants’ attention on the subject, to see patterns and key insights from the forest of words and discussions. It isn’t just about the result itself, but about the participants seeing the whole grow throughout the session: they can SEE the process evolve and remember more and make sense of what is happening. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Engaging multiple senses - not just audio and text, but also visuals (engaging other senses is another story). Our brain can process much more information when multiple senses are involved - illuminated manuscripts, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == What do you need for graphic harvesting? == | ||
+ | * People and conversations | ||
+ | * Room with one or more big flat surfaces (walls, windows) and enough space to move (step back to see the big picture) | ||
+ | * Paper (or blackboards / whiteboards) | ||
+ | * Pens/ | ||
+ | * Masking tape (or other tape that is strong enough, but won’t damage the walls) | ||
+ | * Knife (to cut the paper) | ||
+ | * (big) sticky address labels (for covering up mistakes) | ||
+ | * pastels to create blocks of colour | ||
+ | |||
+ | === What is the process of graphic harvesting? === | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Preparation == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Questions to ask: | ||
+ | * What is the need | ||
+ | * Who are the people | ||
+ | * What is the purpose | ||
+ | * What is the outcome desired | ||
+ | * What is the process (and hosting) | ||
+ | |||
+ | What is the desired format (images, video, graphics, quotes…) | ||
+ | * depends on purpose and outcome | ||
+ | * depends on who it is intended for: | ||
+ | * individual - notes | ||
+ | * collective - graphic | ||
+ | * others who were not a part of the process - graphic for others | ||
+ | |||
+ | To prepare yourself: | ||
+ | * what do I know about the context and the subject? What I don’t know, can I find out? | ||
+ | * What is the nature of the discussion, is there a structure? | ||
+ | * What are the sought outcomes, how can I make sure to capture and visualise them? | ||
+ | * Be aware that in the moment things might go differently, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Capture == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Important to remember that it doesn’t matter what you (the harvester) think. See yourself as a surface (e.g. surface of a lake) - when your mind is still, you can reflect things as they are, when it’s disturbed/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first task is to gather data. Find flow and meaning in the words… | ||
+ | |||
+ | The second (and most important task) is to distill and process data (what is the essence that can inform the outcome): | ||
+ | * Highlight meaning and recurring insight - what is this conversation really about? find keywords (even if they are not said), patterns, name them… Capture things that made the room react, things that they repeat.. | ||
+ | * Relationships and connections (e.g. network maps, clusters, mind maps…) | ||
+ | * Capacities, resources and methods (that can help the group achieve the outcomes) | ||
+ | * Actions (things people mention in passing that already points to 'next steps' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The final task is to create imagery (if there is time). | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Feedback/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Feeding back and feeding forward: using harvesting to make meaning of what happened and to inform the group towards next steps | ||
+ | * Try to get the opportunity to explain what you have done and to ask for feedback (what have I missed?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Harvesting tools === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Letters** (speed vs legibility): | ||
+ | * **Spacing and structuring of space** (frame, flow - e.g. inside-> | ||
+ | * **Lines**: grouping, connection, separation, emphasis | ||
+ | * **Shapes**: enforcing separation and grouping (different shapes have different associations: | ||
+ | * **Symbols**: | ||
+ | * **Visual conventions**: | ||
+ | * **Colours**: | ||
+ | * **Insignia**: | ||
+ | * **Life**: people and things | ||
+ | * **Icons**: use to visualise - steal, or build your own iconography. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Exercises === | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Write the alphabet as quickly and legibly as possible, in a straight line (or lines). | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Have someone read a magazine article out to you and try to: | ||
+ | * a) write it all down as quickly as possible not worrying about where on the paper you place the text | ||
+ | * b) take another article and write it out spatially. think about what is talked about and decide where to place the text. (left-right, | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Write down 3-4 words with sufficient space between them. Then draw different lines: | ||
+ | * one line to group two or more words | ||
+ | * one line to connect two or more words | ||
+ | * one line to separate two or more words | ||
+ | * one line to emphasize one or more words | ||
+ | * try to make a story based on what you see | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Write the same word four times. Then draw a circle around the first word, a square around the next one, a star around or next the following word, a cloud around the final one. Then look at the different words and reflect on the meaning the different shapes add to the written words | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Divide the paper into four parts. Write two words in the first, three in the second, four in the third and five in the fourth. | ||
+ | * In the first part create a [[https:// | ||
+ | * In the second create an [[http:// | ||
+ | * In the third create a [[http:// | ||
+ | * In the fourth connect the five words in a [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Divide your paper into two columns and ~10 rows. In the left column write a word, in the right draw a symbol. The facilitator says words one by one, the participants write and draw: Eg. music, restaurant, toilet, money, love, death, religion, go left, no parking, Belgium, Michelin, Apple... | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The facilitator says words describing emotional states and actions, the participants draw them (using visual conventions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The facilitator shows one coloured card at the time, the participants free associate. What does this colour bring out in you (emotion, action, mood...) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The facilitator shows different ways of drawing people (star people, balloon people, stick figures, squiggles...) and invites participants to create a scene using different kinds of ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Play a short video (5-10 minutes) of a public speech (politicians, | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Next session: Flow, or how to design long form sessions that are composed of different types of conversations and exercises. This session is planned for the 18th December 2014. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Session 7: Flow ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | This session is co-created and hosted by Maja Kuzmanovic and Simone Tiesinga-Poutnik | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Designing a flow in participatory processes concerns the design of the process as a whole and the connections and relationships between different elements (sessions, participants, | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * programme | ||
+ | * schedule | ||
+ | * ark | ||
+ | * flow | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Flow across fields === | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Flow in spiritual practices == | ||
+ | |||
+ | It won’t surprise you that flow is often associated with fluidity & spontaneity. This connotation is embedded in our language. Flow is one of those holistic terms that is applicable across disciplines and cultures. For example, in taoism, flow is related to the notion of [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | One of the important taoist lessons is that to achieve flow it’s important to let go of struggle, to stop fighting against the current to make things happen. It doesn’t mean that we should become apathetic and allow anything to happen, but that it’s important to observe what’s happening and act from an awareness of the situation, rather than holding on to goals that might not be realistic in a given situation. It also teaches us to embrace uncertainty, | ||
+ | |||
+ | A similar concept is found in hinduism and tantric buddhism, something called Sahaja - ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | "The tree grows according to Sahaja, natural and spontaneous in complete conformity with the Natural Law of the Universe. Nobody tells it what to do or how to grow. It has no swadharma or rules, duties and obligations incurred by birth. It has only its own inborn self or essence - to guide it. Sahaja is that nature which, when established in oneself, brings the state of absolute freedom and peace." | ||
+ | https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Flow in ecology and permaculture == | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the science of ecology flow is about the [[https:// | ||
+ | |flow of energy]] in self-organising systems, a way of maintaining a dynamic balance. For example, we talk about energy flows in the food chain: solar energy fixed by plants, moving to primary consumers, herbivores who eat the plants, then to secondary consumers, carnivores and predators who eat the herbivores and finally the decomposers the fungi, maggots and insects who eat all that decays. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | In permaculture it is important to harness the [[ | ||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Crowd dynamics == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Crowd is non-linear, time dependent and has a particular type of intelligence of its own, that is different to the sum of intelligencies of each individual in the crowd. It can be related to [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Traditional medicine == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Within our bodies, according to ancient healing systems like [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | In TCM, the Flow of Qi or life energy happens through a network of meridians that criss-cross our bodies. We use acupuncture to stimulate the flow in the meridians. In TAM illness is caused by blockages in the flow of fluids and energy through the body that can only be cleared using a holistic approach - massage, diet, meditation, movement and environmental stimuli. The physical and energetic flows are inextricably connected - something that contemporary reductionist and disciplinary approaches to medicine are lacking. [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Human flow experiences === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our mental flows influence the way we interact with the world. Particular activities make us feel as if things flow from inside us to the outside and back again - we say we feel ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | List characteristics in terms of emotions, actions, resources. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | In our exercise the answers were the following: | ||
+ | * an intrinsic goal, the activity is the goal itself | ||
+ | * a pleasant relationship with time, joyful | ||
+ | * intense focus without distractions, | ||
+ | * concentrated energy | ||
+ | * disappearance/ | ||
+ | * crossing the treshold, a point of no return | ||
+ | * a dance with pleasure and pain | ||
+ | * spontaneity and serendipity | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Flow in Psychology === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Flow (aka Zone) in psychology, according to Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, | ||
+ | |||
+ | According to the flow theory three conditions that have to be met in order to reach 'the zone': | ||
+ | |||
+ | * involvement in an activity with clear goals and progress | ||
+ | * clear feedback must exist between your action and its effect on the task (so you can adjust what you’re doing to remain in the flow state) | ||
+ | * a good balance between perceived challenges and your own perceived skills - you must be confident that you are able to complete the task at hand. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | //Flow model// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | When deliberately designing for flow experiences it’s good to keep these conditions and their effects in mind. It is therefore important to know beforehand who the people are, what is their skill level and what they’re interested in. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | In Schaffer’s model several conditions must be met: | ||
+ | * Knowing what to do | ||
+ | * Knowing how to do it | ||
+ | * Knowing how well you are doing | ||
+ | * Knowing where to go (if navigation is involved) | ||
+ | * High perceived challenges | ||
+ | * High perceived skills | ||
+ | * Freedom from distractions | ||
+ | |||
+ | Something similar is often used in game design: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Group flow === | ||
+ | |||
+ | So far we talked about individual flow experiences, | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are some characteristics of groups that psychologists suggest we should think about: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Creative spatial arrangements: | ||
+ | * Playground design: Charts for information inputs, flow graphs, project summary, craziness (here also craziness has a place), safe place (here all may say what is otherwise only thought), result wall, open topics | ||
+ | * Parallel, organized working | ||
+ | * Target group focus | ||
+ | * Prototyping and visualising, | ||
+ | * Using differences among participants as an opportunity, | ||
+ | |||
+ | See more about [[https:// | ||
+ | |Flow Psychology on Wikipedia]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Spatial Flow: How will people move in space, what is there to guide them, how do you steer movement, is there enough personal space? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Useful metaphors | ||
+ | * different forms of water - raindrops, brook, river, waterfall, lake, puddle, ocean… | ||
+ | * swarms, flocks - group made of individual particles | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Temporal flow: How will the group move towards its purpose while staying engaged and energised? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Useful metaphors | ||
+ | * ebb & flow | ||
+ | * breathing, pulsing | ||
+ | * birth, growth, decay, death | ||
+ | * day, season, year, decade… | ||
+ | * cycles within cycles | ||
+ | * bodily rhythms - different processes occurring simultaneously… think about flows for individuals (different shades of introverts and extroverts), | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Designing group flows === | ||
+ | |||
+ | We tend to rely on a combination of intuition (which comes through practice - our craft) and on proven techniques (either developed by ourselves or others). Intuition cant be taught. It comes from an iterative practice of designing a flow beforehand then running through it in your minds eye and check what your gut feeling says, then adjust accordingly. It also helps to run through the flow with someone you trust - whether they are co-facilitating with you or not - as if you’re crowdsourcing your intuition. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Both intuition and known techniques can give us enough grounding to include more experimental methods, which we always do - otherwise the sessions can become stale and routine. Most participatory processes are akin to the creative process which consists of phases of divergence and convergence, | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | // | ||
+ | |||
+ | It’s good to prepare the flow (in quite a bit of detail) beforehand, then adjust on the spot if something doesn’t feel right. No predesigned flow is ever perfect. It’s like a canal vs. a river. A canal cuts through a landscape according to a plan, a river carves its way through a landscape on its lowest points, where there is least resistance. To recognise the resistance the hosts rely on their keen perception and observation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Designing a flow must be an iterative process. It’s like breathing - there is a progress but it develops through different cycles (e.g agreeing on purpose, action, reflection). In the Art of Hosting one of the approaches to designing the flow is a process called [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | - The Call: the caller formulates the question and creates commitment in the team (with hosts help) | ||
+ | - Clarify: clarifying the purpose and context, agree on the core team and people’s roles | ||
+ | - Invite: "the art of invitation" | ||
+ | - Design: create the ' | ||
+ | - Meet: before starting, check-in with the team and make sure you’re all present and grounded… It’s good to have someone to do 'space hosting' | ||
+ | - Harvest: reflection: a good framework to use is the so called [[http:// | ||
+ | - Act: communication, | ||
+ | - Reflection: breathe, celebrate, connect back to the purpose and the call | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Hosting as Art and Craft === | ||
+ | |||
+ | In designing flows we have to remember that it isn’t all about methodologies and formats - the stakes are much higher than that. Focusing on the techniques alone cannot produce life-changing experiences. [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | The image above by Simone Tiesinga-Poutnik describes a holistic approach to hosting. Grounded in our own source of life, we must pay attention to the world-views - our own and those present in the group (e.g. relational, mechanistic…), | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Participatory techniques === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here are a few links to (compilations of) existing techniques: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * (see also the reference links at the bottom of this page) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Flow exercise === | ||
+ | |||
+ | As our hosting craft session was close to the winter solstice, our flow exercise was to collectively design a solstice ritual. | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | Exercise: Design a ritual | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Call\\ | ||
+ | hat is the purpose of the ritual? One or more people can succinctly describe the call, which can be discussed until everyone agrees on the purpose. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Ingredients\\ | ||
+ | Brainstorm (first individually, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Flow\\ | ||
+ | Combine the components into the flow of the ritual. How does it begin, where does it end? What are the inputs and outputs of each component? What is missing? Do we need additional/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Production\\ | ||
+ | Once you are satisfied with the flow, work on the details - the practicalities and logistics. Decide on the roles - who is doing what? Do they know what their role entails? Do they need anything from others? Think about the resources needed - materials, media, scents, foods or any other physical elements that might need to be made or procured. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Rehearsal\\ | ||
+ | Run through the ritual with everyone. First talk through the flow, then actually do it, by briefly walking through the spaces you’ll be using, inviting the people responsible for different components to explain what will be happening. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Ritual\\ | ||
+ | Set the intention to go through the ritual and fulfil its purpose. Check-in with the team and do a short grounding/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Reflection\\ | ||
+ | After a short break have a brief reflection on what people experienced (possibly using the "what? so what? then what?" framework. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Celebration\\ | ||
+ | End the session in a celebration of your choosing. It can be as simple as toasting to each other, or as elaborate as a whole party. It’s up to you, you are - after all - the host! | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === The end === | ||
+ | |||
+ | With the flow and the ritual, we come to the end of the Hosting Craft training. It was an inspiring learning journey. From now on we will transform into a community of practice, sharing experiences and supporting each other’s facilitation effort. | ||
+ | |||
+ | My warm thanks to Simone Tiesinga-Poutnik who much enriched the last session on flow. But most of all I’d like to thank the gracious host-trainees: | ||
==== References ==== | ==== References ==== | ||
Line 385: | Line 902: | ||
* Chaordic Design | * Chaordic Design | ||
* http:// | * http:// | ||
+ | * Ideo method cards | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
A few experiments that we at FoAM scavenged and adapted from various methods | A few experiments that we at FoAM scavenged and adapted from various methods | ||
Line 390: | Line 909: | ||
* A series of exercises for a research course at KABK lasting 6 weeks: http:// | * A series of exercises for a research course at KABK lasting 6 weeks: http:// | ||
* FoAM's experimental methodology to create embodied future scenarios: http:// | * FoAM's experimental methodology to create embodied future scenarios: http:// | ||
+ | * Variations on the prehearsal pocket guide can be found through Future Fabulators [[:/ | ||
* Luminous Green workshops and retreats (the pages include briefings, questions, framings, harvesting etc.): | * Luminous Green workshops and retreats (the pages include briefings, questions, framings, harvesting etc.): | ||
* http:// | * http:// |