Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
resilients:go_ask_a_mushroom [2013-01-31 16:54] – 46.128.23.163 | resilients:go_ask_a_mushroom [2017-01-19 09:37] – old revision restored (2013/02/17 20:10) 46.161.9.24 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | === Go Ask A Mushroom === | ||
- | |||
- | Musings on Afterculture | ||
- | |||
- | By Natalia Borissova | ||
- | |||
- | What possible intelligent natural systems can we look to for inspiration and direction in the patterning of our human living environments, | ||
- | |||
- | ===Spawning the resilium=== | ||
- | |||
- | Looking at forestry mycelia links all the elements of the mixed woodland together, unlocks nutrient sources stored in plants and other organisms, redistributes those to wherever they are most needed, converts rock into food for other species, builds the soil and maintains ecosystem diversity. It does cardinal, life-enhancing work on a grassroots and in constant dialogue with its environment. Human urban interventions and artificial fertilizers cause mycelia to retreat and the soil to lose a key part of its vibrancy. (Less arti-ficial we are – better it will be for our network and natural process of inventively). But myselium is a very resilient organism. It can reconnect and remediate poisoned land. So, if it can thrive even on gifts, may be it also can remediate a society poisoned by relentless abuse of power and the contemporary culture decorated by artificiality, | ||
- | |||
- | As the mycelium exhausts the food sources in one area it expands outward in a circular fashion the fungus cannibalizes the inner mycelium, extracting whatever nutrients it can from there and moves them to the outer, growing regions. Whatever cannot be recycled is shut off from the growing region and allowed to decay. May be it's the time for the culture to cannibalizes the inner of itself extracting nutrients and redistribute them according to the real needs? | ||
- | |||
- | By analogy with mycelia as the vegetal part of a fungal culture, a “resilients-organism” (“resilium”) could be compared with a fungus which spreads out widely through time and space, popping up in the most unexpected places to spark joyful illuminations. It adsorbs complex reality upside down, digests it externally by relishing enzymes of curiosity, creativity and knowledge. It makes it available for the self-absorption and for other organisms to feast on. It’s important to note that this method - ' | ||
- | Efforts of the resilium need to be focused on the cultivation of healthy soil and ecosystem (aka a non-discriminative and co-creative environment). | ||
- | |||
- | ===From mono-culture to self-sustaining ecosystem=== | ||
- | |||
- | What layout or design of our (food)environment could be called “nature-logical”? | ||
- | When each individual organism has multiple roles and interconnections within this kind of ecosystem, edges can be optimised and resources reused. Problems, limitations and mistakes can be embraced creatively, and the environment thrives. There is no need to impose connections from the outside, as each of the ecosystem’s parts is self-organising. The design of this interconnected, | ||
- | |||
- | If we believe that cultural communities are real and not merely constructs used for formal and pragmatic convenience, | ||
- | |||
- | In the time of the Afterculture, | ||